我来解释一下吧 　　Theargumentdescribedaboveisinteresting.FirstitintroducedatoothpastewhichnamedSmile-Brightandthenitsaysthatthistoothpastecanbringacappedteeth.Butwhetherlikelytohaveacappedteethinvolvesmorefactorsnotonlywhichtoothpastetheyused.Suchaseatinghabit,sleepquality,andsoon.Soifwanttomakethereportmoreaccurate,thesefactorshouldbeconsidered.Thewriter'sreportonlyconsideroneofthethosefactors,itisnotaccurate. 　　此处你的质疑是还有其它因素会导致cappedteeth,但是你应加以证明,或引用具体的例证或数据说明饮食习惯和睡眠等因素也会导致cappedteeth.否则你就和作者一样,凭空说用Smile-Bright牙膏会导致cappedteeth. 　　建议：你应该攻击这句话的逻辑关系,指出作者没有论证使用Smile-Bright牙膏会导致cappedteeth之间是否存在因果关系.如果不加以论证,那么任何因素（如饮食习惯和睡眠等）都可以导致cappedteeth了. 　　.此外,Butwhetherlikelytohaveacappedteethinvolvesmorefactorsnotonlywhichtoothpastetheyused.此句中acappedteeth和notonlywhichtoothpastetheyused.是语法错误.建议改成However,whetherpeoplearelikelytohavecappedteethinvolvesmorefactorsbesidestoothpastetheyused.较为稳妥. 　　Soifwanttomakethereportmoreaccurate,thesefactorshouldbeconsidered.Thewriter'sreportonlyconsideroneofthethosefactors,itisnotaccurate.语法有错误,句子不简练.建议改成Soiftheauthorwantstomakethereportmoreaccurate,heneedstoconsiderallthefactors. 　　Next,itissaysthattheearlierandmorefrequentlytousetheSmile-Brighttoothpastethemorelikelytocappedteeth.Itsoundslikeanadvertisement.Despitethecapisreallyexistence,imaginethatakidusethistoothpastefourorevenmoretimesaday,Idon'tknowwhetherthiswaycouldbringthe"caps",butIknowtheonethingthatthisfrequentlyusetoothpasteforakid,willharmhisteethinsteadofprotectedthem.Inaddition,aswellallknownthatapersonmustchangeteethabouttheageofseven.Sousethistoothpastebeforetheageisuseless,becausetheseteethwilldrop.Backtotheoriginaloftheargument,theexistenceofthecapsarenotonlycontributedbythetoothpaste,itinvolvesseveralfactors.SowhetherthecapsformedbytheSmile-Brighttoothpasteisnotsure,tosaynothingofearlierandfrequently. 　　Itsoundslikeanadvertisement.这句话和文章驳论无关,而且容易引起争议,应删除.国外法律严格,广告不敢夸大宣传忽悠用户,否则会惹来官司,厂商会赔的倾家荡产. 　　Despitethecapisreallyexistence,imaginethatakidusethistoothpastefourorevenmoretimesaday,Idon'tknowwhetherthiswaycouldbringthe"caps",.此例子较好,但应该用于攻击Smile-Bright牙膏导致cappedteeth不存在因果关系较为合适. 　　butIknowtheonethingthatthisfrequentlyusetoothpasteforakid,willharmhisteethinsteadofprotectedthem此处没有论证或数据说明为什么刷牙次数多会伤害幼儿的牙齿,而且你似乎想说明多次刷牙不能够保护儿童,而对儿童牙齿有害,与驳斥文章的主要观点（牙膏导致cappedteeth）无关. 　　建议改成牙膏导致cappedteeth这一条对儿童不适用.还要加上论证,比如你所说的儿童会换牙等等. 　　Backtotheoriginaloftheargument,theexistenceofthecapsarenotonlycontributedbythetoothpaste,itinvolvesseveralfactors.SowhetherthecapsformedbytheSmile-Brighttoothpasteisnotsure,tosaynothingofearlierandfrequently.此处重复了第一段的观点没有必要. 　　建议：牢牢记住你写文章的目的是驳斥Smile-Bright牙膏会导致cappedteeth. 　　Theauthor'sconclusion"peoplewhowishtoavoidthecapsshouldnotuseSmile-Brighttoothpaste"isfundamentallyunfounded.Throughthefactorofformthecapsisdiversity.EvennotusetheSmile-Brighttoothpaste,havecapsonteethisalsopossible.Idon'tknowthegoalofthisarticle,whethertheauthorwanttosupportsomeusefulhe