Coincidentwiththeimmenseimprovementofoursociety,TVandInternethavebeenplayinganincreasinglyimportantrole.Thisphenomenonseemstoindicatethattheywillreplacebooksasthemajorsourceofinformation.However,fromwhereIstand,Iholdtheoppositeopinion.Thereareseveralreasonsboomingmyview.Forastart,traditionally,it'salmostimpossibletorealizethedreamwhereeveryonehasacomputerorTV,nottomentionreadingorstudyingbyone.Then,tosomedegree,theyjustserveasthemodelforentertainment.Contrarytowhatsomepeoplesaid,Iinsistthatbooksstillserveasthemainsourceasknowledgeistaughtbythismeans.Lastbutnotleast,informationgotacrossthroughthewebturnedouttobewrong,examplesofwhichcanbeseenwhentheearthquakebegan,somebusinessmenjustcheatedtowinabigprofit.Moreover,informationgiventhroughbooksseemmuchmorereliable,sincepeopletendtocheakbeforetheyaregivenout.Withthereasonsabove,Iwouldlovetoarguethatbookswillremainthemaintargetforknowledgeandinformation.